Accurate! Fast Friendly Service!
“In my twenty years as a
pharmacist, I’m happy to work
take care of their customers.”
Natu “Nick” Gevaria, BS Rph Pharmacist
FREE
DELIVERY
BRONX TIMES REPORTER, O BTR CTOBER 4-10, 2019 47
,
FAMILY COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF THE BRONX
Docket No. NN-27974-75-17
SUMMONS
In the Matter of
EMELY NAVARRO/LIA SANCHEZ
A Child(ren) Under Eighteen Years
Alleged to be Neglected by
PEDRO NAVARRO
Respondent(s)
NOTICE: PLACEMENT OF YOUR CHILD IN FOSTER CARE MAY RESULT IN THE LOSS OF YOUR
RIGHTS TO YOUR CHILD. IF YOUR CHILD STAYS IN FOSTER CARE FOR 15 OF THE MOST
RECENT 22 MONTHS, THE AGENCY MAY BE REQUIRED BY LAW TO FILE A PETITION TO
TERMINATE YOUR PARENTAL RIGHTS AND TO COMMIT GUARDIANSHIP AND CUSTODY OF
YOUR CHILD TO THE AGENCY FOR THE PURPOSES OF ADOPTION. IN SOME CASES, THE
AGENCY MAY FILE BEFORE THE END OF THE 15-MONTH PERIOD. IF SEVERE OR REPEATED
CHILD ABUSE IS PROVEN BY CLEAN AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE, THIS FINDING MAY
CONSTITUTE THE BASIS TO TERMINATE YOUR PARENTAL RIGHTS AND TO COMMIT
GUARDIANSHIP AND CUSTODY OF YOUR CHILD TO THE AGENCY FOR THE PURPOSES OF
ADOPTION.
TO: PEDRO NAVARRO (D.O.B. 10/26/77)
A petition under ARTICLE 10 of the FAMILY COURT ACT having been filed with this court alleging that
the above-named child(ren) is a neglected child(ren), a copy of said petition being annexed hereto
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to appear before this court at 900 Sheridan Avenue, Bronx, New
York, 10451, Part 99, on October 31, 2019 at 10:30 A.M. oʼclock of said day to answer the petition and to
show cause why said child(ren) should not be adjudicated to be a neglected child(ren) and why you
should not be dealth with in accordance with the provisions of ARTICLE 10 of the FAMILY COURT ACT
and why an order of support under SECTION 235 of the FAMILY COURT ACT should not be made if the
final disposition is an order of placement.
On your failure to appear as herein directed, a warrant may be issued for your arrest.
FURTHER NOTICE: Family Court Act §154 (c) provides that petitions brought pursuant to Articles 4, 5, 6,
8 and 10 of the Family Court Act, in which an order of protection is sought or in which a violation of an
order of protection is alleged, may be served outside the State of New York upon a Respondent who is not
a resident or domiciliary of the State of New York. If no other grounds for obtaining personal jurisdiction
over the Respondent exist aside from the application of this provision, the exercise of personal jurisdiction
over the respondent is limited to the issue of the request for, or alleged violation of the order of protection.
Where the Respondent has been served with this summons and petition and does not appear, the Family
Court may proceed to a hearing with respect to issuance or enforcement of the order of protection.
STEPHEN G. BYRNES
CLERK OF THE FAMILY COURT
Dated: 9/13/19
SIRECI
Family Dental
Your Neighborhood Dentist Since 1983
IF YOU HAVE SPACES
WE HAVE BRACES
FREE
CONSULTATIONS
COME VISIT US
IN OUR NEW
MODERN OFFICE
C A R I N G A F F O R D A B L E P A I N L E S S
2861 BRUCKNER BLVD. | 718-829-0455
SECURITY DRUGS
Goodman Plaza Pharmacy
We Now Accept WIC