38 THE QUEENS COURIER • HEALTH • AUGUST 6, 2020 FOR BREAKING NEWS VISIT WWW.QNS.COM 
  health 
 Wandering is one of the most  
 diffi  cult  management  problems  
 encountered in the institutional  
 setting. Each year a resident may  
 wander away from a facility only  
 to be found later, confused and/ 
 or injured due to the unfamiliar  
 surroundings. 
 Media attention and potential  
 litigation suggest that staff   may  
 have been lax for this to occur.  
 Wandering in and of itself has  
 an upside to it. Th  ere may be  
 times when a resident may want  
 to practice safe wandering. Th e  
 rate and amount of time wandering  
 that  is  attempted,  may  
 appear to the untrained eye as  
 too excessive. However, if it is  
 not  deemed  as  a  problem,  it  
 should be encouraged with minimal  
 staff  involvement. 
 According to the researchers  
 Hussian and David, “Wandering  
 patterns,  when  fully  analyzed,  
 suggest that the institutionalized  
 geriatric person off ers  several  
 possible reasons for unsafe wandering  
 behavior.” 
 1. Neuroleptic induced ambulation  
 – being medicated with  
 long  term  neuroleptic  drugs  
 can cause an inability to sit still,  
 that fosters random and aimless  
 movements and an array of other  
 neurological defi cits. Th e symptoms  
 can be mentally exhausting  
 and  physically  debilitating  for  
 that resident. 
 2. Exit seeking behavior that  
 is highly motivated and can persist  
 until resident fi nds gratifi cation  
 in the immediate environment  
 that will eventually reduce  
 a desire to exit from facility. 
 3.  Self-stimulation  behavior  
 observed with the advanced  
 dementia resident and associated  
 with various stereotypical outcomes  
 such as endless handclapping, 
   persistent  irritation  with  
 others, angry tirades toward staff   
 or unrelieved and harsh sounding  
 vocalizations that make little  
 sense to the laity’s perception of  
 the resident’s actions. 
 4.  Modeling  –  the  resident  
 with  dementia  and  confusion  
 will “shadow” another wanderer  
 by following him to the detriment  
 of both. 
 Here are several reasons that  
 may explain a resident’s unsafe  
 wandering: 
 Searching for food aft er  the  
 meal has been served, eaten and  
 recorded by staff  attending to  
 resident. 
 Repeating past work patterns 
 – resident acting out their past  
 employment that may be unsafe  
 to deal with. 
 Unrelieved  boredom  –  
 increased agitation toward residents  
 and staff / 
 Change in weather – barometric  
 fl uctuations that cause irrational  
 behavior in what psychiatrists  
 have identifi ed as an “emotional  
 storm  with  dangerous  
 reactions.” 
 Lack of activity encourages residents  
 to devise their own activities  
 which may prove unsafe to  
 self and others. 
 Wandering as a form of anxiety  
 reduction – tension wandering, 
  causing a climate for seeking  
 exit from facility. 
 Searching for a friendly ally  
 who can help – increased wandering  
 when an appropriate ally  
 cannot be found. 
 Fear  of  unfamiliar  environment  
 – resulting in unsafe wandering, 
  and as a way of looking  
 for a quiet and secure place  
 to refl ect. 
 Case  Study:  Robert,  a  resident  
 in a long term care facility  
 was observed wandering unsafely  
 from his room and making a  
 right turn toward the door leading  
 to the stairs and the street.  
 Th  is action set off   an  electronic  
 bell, sending staff  running to  
 retrieve  Robert  from  potential  
 harm. By recognizing this as a  
 dangerous action, staff  were able  
 to allay a potential disaster. Aft er  
 numerous attempts at exiting  
 the facility, staff  decided to have  
 Robert’s room changed so that a  
 right turn led him instead to the  
 facility’s lounge area, thus avoiding  
 the door leading to the street.  
 With his room changed, Robert’s  
 exiting the facility subsided. 
 Th  is is but one example used  
 for securing a resident’s safety  
 who  is  suff ering persistent confusion. 
  Staff  discussed the room  
 change with Robert’s family and  
 was told that in his home, the  
 kitchen was approximately to the  
 right of his bedroom. Th e  case  
 study is but one example of how  
 a resident’s safety was secured  
 with the aid of family and staff . 
 Th  e  stimulus  for  wandering  
 arises from internal and external  
 sources. Th  e concept known  
 as “agenda behaviors” was fi rst  
 identifi ed  by  the  researcher  
 Rader, who discovered that wanderers  
 have specifi c patterns that  
 give clues as to their needs, and  
 when those needs are met, the  
 wandering tends to stop. 
 Another technique for dealing  
 with unsafe wandering is called  
 the “buddy system,” employed  
 with a willing individual (i.e. resident), 
  who can provide companionship  
 for varying periods  
 during the day and can account  
 for the confused resident’s continued  
 presence and safety. It is,  
 however, important that the resident  
 participating as a buddy  
 partner must never be coerced  
 into being a buddy partner indefinitely  
 or even wanting him to do  
 so in the fi rst place. Happily, the  
 buddy  practice  was  successful  
 and is still being employed in  
 several other facilities with residents  
 who have been identifi ed  
 by staff  as unsafe wanderers. 
 As  stated  previously,  unrelieved  
 boredom, as a result of  
 poorly  planned  activity  programs, 
  is a disaster waiting to  
 happen. Without realizable goals  
 that are carefully structured, the  
 confused individual will, inevitably, 
  fi nd a way of eloping from  
 the facility even with expensive  
 electronic technology designed  
 to thwart an incident. 
 Here are several suggestions  
 for implementing a strong activity  
 program,  thereby  lowering  
 unsafe wandering incidents. 
 Conduct programs and activities  
 that meet the individual’s  
 needs (current events, songfests,  
 discussion groups). 
 Encourage interpersonal contacts  
 with other residents and with  
 similar needs and backgrounds,  
 thus infl uencing camaraderie. 
 Employ  lively  activities  that  
 can dissipate resident agitation  
 and  restoring  their  focus  and  
 participation with others. 
 Perform musical concerts with  
 classical and popular melodies  
 that provide friendly stimulation  
 and a connection with others. 
 Schedule  n ature  walks  that  
 off er relief from daily institutional  
 routines and a temporary  
 change of venue and staff . 
 Distribute live plants to those  
 residents  who  will  accept  the  
 responsibility  for  overseeing  
 their care. 
 Th  e focus of this article was  
 to recommend the safety measures  
 and anti-wandering programs  
 that have been successfully  
 employed  for  protecting  
 the nursing home resident from  
 unsafe wandering. 
 On a more personal note, I am  
 convinced, based on years of experience  
 in long term care, there will  
 come a time in the not too distant  
 future when family members  
 will consider admitting their loved  
 one to a nursing facility that advocates  
 for quality health care practices  
 and that includes a secure  
 and happy environment. For the  
 present however, I will continue  
 hunkering down during this global  
 crisis with the hope that all of  
 you are practicing the same. Stay  
 well, stay strong, stay safe, and  
 above all, stay mentally and physically  
 positive. 
 Sheldon  Ornstein  Ed.D,  RN,  
 LNHA 
 Wandering  
 and Aging 
 Dr. Sheldon Ornstein is a  
 registered professional  
 nurse with a doctoral  
 degree in nursing organization. 
  He has specialized  
 in the care of older adults  
 and has published many  
 articles on the subject. He  
 has done post-graduate  
 work in gerontology and  
 has taught at several universities. 
  In 2013, he was  
 inducted into the Nursing  
 Hall of Fame at Teachers  
 College, Columbia  
 University. 
 
				
/WWW.QNS.COM