14 AUGUST 27, 2020 RIDGEWOOD TIMES WWW.QNS.COM
Q&A with Judge
Anthony Cannataro
BY DEAN MOSES
EDITORIAL@QNS.COM
@QNS
Schneps Media is sitting down with
judges across the city’s court systems
to discuss their roles and how
they’ve changed in the age of COVID-19.
This week’s interview is with the Hon.
Anthony Cannataro, Citywide Administrative
Judge of the Civil Court of the
City of New York and Justice of the New
York State Supreme Court.
Schneps Media: Could you describe
your duties as an Administrative
Judge?
Hon. Anthony Cannataro: I am
the Citywide Administrative Judge
for the Civil Court of the City of New
York (one of the three citywide courts
along with Family Court and Criminal
Court). The Civil Court operates in all
fi ve borough and is best known for
our housing part (the
court that landlords
go to when they seek
to evict their tenants
and to litigate other
housing matters). That
is an extremely highvolume
court, approximately
225,000
new cases are filed
every year. The other
well-known operation
of the Civil Court is the
Small Claims Court.
My job is to oversee
the day-to-day operations.
I deal with budgets, with problems
like disciplinary issues, and
attendance issues as they come up. I
also deal with what we call access to
justice, which is the court’s eff ort to
make these high-volume cases fairer
for people. Many of the litigants who
come here do not have attorneys representing
them. So, we must go out of
our way to make sure that the process
is as fair as it can be even for people
who don’t have attorneys.
SM: Have housing cases increased
because of the pandemic?
AC: Not necessarily. I would almost
say that the issue of representation
has gotten a little better because of
the pandemic, which is not to say that
everything is great. Since the pandemic
began there has been a more
concerted movement, both within the
court and outside the court to try to
get counsel assigned for people who
are facing eviction and who don’t have
lawyers.
SM: How has the position changed
during the pandemic?
AC: I fi nd myself communicating a
lot more with interest groups that represent
various litigants. For example,
in the housing sphere, there are many
groups out there who are concerned
about evictions happening during a
pandemic and all the problems that
come along with litigating those
kinds of cases and possibly evicting
people as a result of those cases. I’m
now speaking a lot publicly and in
smaller groups with the various interest
groups about how the court can do
its business and still be mindful of the
public health and safety needs of the
litigants who come before us.
There are many interests to balance.
It’s extremely diffi cult. Using housing
as the prime example: On the one hand
you have tenants who probably lost
their jobs, they legitimately cannot
aff ord to pay their rent. But you have
landlords, many of whom are small
landlords who just own two or three
apartments, maybe in just one building
and they have to pay taxes and they
have to pay mortgages. There are a lot
of diff erent perspectives.
SM: Has there been
a silver lining during
the pandemic?
AC: The pandemic has
really driven us into using
technology to help us
do what we do. Whereas
before the pandemic
you would hardly ever
see virtual appearance
or conferencing with
the court or among the
parties. We have moved
forward aggressively
into using teleconferencing
platforms to do
our work. There is a lot being done
with remote appearance.
SM: Are there any misconceptions
people have about judges you would
like to clear up?
AC: The biggest misconception
about judges is that we are not sensitive
to the needs of the litigants that
appear in front of us, and I say this as
someone who oversees a court where
there are so many unrepresented people
from such diverse backgrounds.
I think there is a feeling that judges
don’t understand what regular people
are going through. People tend to forget
sometimes that judges are regular
people. We come in all diff erent types,
sizes, and backgrounds.
SM: Are there some hobbies you
enjoy partaking in during your free
time?
AC: I grew up as a child of Italian
immigrants. I spent many of my summers
in Italy and as I became older, I
started seeing the world. I just love to
travel. That’s the bug I have.
I love visiting off the beaten path
locations and cultures that I’ve never
seen before. Last summer, I went to the
Azores, which are small islands in the
middle of the Atlantic Ocean that are
a part of Portugal.
HIGHER ED TODAY
Like universities across the country,
CUNY has worked intensely these
past six months to keep our students on
track for graduation despite the unprecedented
obstacles of the pandemic. It’s
the technical challenges of teaching and
learning from a distance that get most of
the attention, but we are just as focused
on helping our faculty become more effective
teachers — and our students, better
learners — in ways that have nothing
to do with laptops, digital platforms
or video conference apps.
In the education world, the word for
this is pedagogy: How teachers teach,
how students learn and what methods
and approaches have proven most effective
at elevating student achievement and
outcomes. It’s a recognition that teaching
is an art, a science and a craft. That consideration
is one of our key priorities at
CUNY — a way to both boost student success
and support the invaluable resource
that is our faculty. Improving and innovating
our teaching strategies was front
and center before the coronavirus, and
we haven’t let the scramble to put courses
online throw us off track.
CUNY students began the fall semester
this week, and the vast majority of
their nearly 50,000 course sections — 98
percent — are being delivered virtually.
They will surely benefit from the work
their professors, their campuses and
their university have done to adopt instructional
practices that put a priority
on the needs of online learners. For obvious
reasons, much of the professional
development training we have offered to
faculty in recent months has focused on
the improvement of distance learning.
But that effort is part of a bigger project at
CUNY that will far outlast the pandemic.
Studies have supported the notion
that improving pedagogy can make a
significant difference in student success.
That shouldn’t come as a surprise, but
this should: Most college faculty undergo
almost no professional development to
build these skills, or to improve their
teaching methods, while in graduate
school. It’s just not something that universities
have traditionally emphasized
as much as they ought to. I began my career
as a history professor and taught for
many years, and whatever training I got
in pedagogy was not something promoted
by the University. That is why I have prioritized
a long-term series of initiatives to
fill a demonstrated need.
At the top of the list is the CUNY Innovative
Teaching Academy, which will
serve as a hub for professional development
and the vibrant exchange of ideas
for new approaches to student engagement
and success. Last year, we forged
partnerships to launch several pilot projects
for the academy aimed at helping faculty
master best practices for both online
and in-person teaching.
For starters, we are teaming with
the Association of College and University
Educators (ACUE) and the National
Association of System Heads (NASH)
on a 25-week program in which 300 faculty
from CUNY senior colleges will be
trained in practices that improve student
achievement and close equity gaps.
This fall, another 420 faculty will be
trained and credentialed in online teaching
methods that focus on areas such as
creating an inclusive learning environment,
inspiring inquiry and designing
learner-centered courses.
More recently, we announced a $10
million gift from the Andrew W. Mellon
Foundation that includes $2 million to
train humanities faculty in ways to make
their classes more participatory and prepare
students for a world that requires
collaboration, communication, analytical
reading and cross-cultural thinking.
We hope the Innovative Teaching
Academy will become a national model.
The pandemic has required us to focus
our professional development efforts
on training that helps our faculty improve
student engagement and foster an
inclusive, encouraging instructional atmosphere
in the online modality. It’s been
an all-hands-on-deck effort this summer
to provide programs with noted experts
and partnerships with other academic institutions.
Leveraging the expertise of the CUNY
School of Professional Studies, a longtime
national leader in online degree programs,
CUNY created online developmental
workshops for more than 2,000 faculty
members across the system to improve
their online instructional practices. I’m
confident that the benefits will be apparent,
and that they will be just one part of
our long-range commitment to improved
teaching.
We’ve been confronted this year by
enormous challenges to our broad educational
mission, and to our specific efforts
to help our students complete their
courses, earn enough credits each semester
to graduate on time and pursue
careers that will allow them to climb the
economic and social ladder. But even as
health and budgetary circumstances remain
uncertain, CUNY’s commitment to
improving student outcomes and supporting
our faculty is unwavering.
After all they’ve endured in coping
with the challenges of the pandemic, our
students, faculty and staff deserve nothing
less.
link
/WWW.QNS.COM
link