
 
		FOR BREAKING NEWS VISIT WWW.QNS.COM   NOVEMBER 29, 2018 • THE QUEENS COURIER 29 
 Call Now & End Your Tax Nightmare! 
  
  
  
  
  
 Co-Author of the  
 best selling book 
 “Breaking the Tax Code” 
  
  
 Salvatore P. Candela, EA, ATA, ABA 
 Enrolled Agent - Tax Advisor 
  
  
 ALTER EGO 
 Q:  I am a truck driver.  One day, I tried to open the bay door at the  
 back of a truck.  There was something wrong with it, and so I badly injured  
 my wrist.  Under a policy issued to my employer, I received workers’ compensation  
 benefits.  I do not think my employer owned this truck, although we  
 often did jobs with it. 
 A:  Under the Workers’ Compensation Law, you are barred from suing  
 your employer: the benefits that you received are your exclusive remedy.  If  
 the owner was an alter ego of your employer, then these exclusivity provisions  
 also bar you from suing the owner.  That is, the protection against a lawsuit  
 also extends to an alter ego of your employer. 
   To establish itself as an alter ego, the owner must demonstrate either  
 that it and your employer operated as a single integrated entity, or that one  
 company controlled the day-to-day operations of the other.  To do so, perhaps  
 the owner will present evidence that the two entities were related and, among  
 other things, shared some officers. 
   In opposition, you may be able to show that the entities were formed  
 for different purposes, had separate bank accounts, filed separate tax returns,  
 and had different workers’ compensation policies.  Moreover, the owner’s  
 name was on the cabin doors of the owner’s trucks, one of the owner’s  
 employees oversaw the purchase and maintenance of the trucks, and the  
 owner billed your employer for its services.  In this way, you may have a  
 strong case that the exclusivity defense of the Workers’ Compensation Law in  
 fact does not bar a suit against the owner.