Biden Admin. to Federal Court: Protect Trans Inmates 
 Justice Department signals departure from Trump era policies 
 BY ARTHUR S. LEONARD 
 The  Justice  Department  
 fi led a “Statement of  
 Interest” in the pending  
 case of Diamond v.  
 Ward in the US District Court for  
 the  Middle  District  of  Alabama  
 on April 22. Ashley Diamond, a  
 transgender woman, is suing state  
 prison offi cials for violation of her  
 Eighth Amendment rights to safety  
 and adequate health care. 
 The DOJ is not taking a position  
 on the facts in this case, but is reminding  
 the court of the legal obligation  
 to protect trans inmates. 
 Diamond has been in and out  
 of prison several times, and even  
 benefi ted from the fi ling  of  an  
 Obama Administration amicus  
 brief in one of her earlier lawsuits  
 struggling  for  appropriate  treatment  
 in prison. Her most recent  
 incarceration, because of a parole  
 violation, subjected her to the same  
 old, same old: She was tossed into  
 a male prison with inadequate attention  
 to her safety or medical  
 needs.  Diamond’s  litigation  history  
 has led to relationships with  
 organizations, such as the Center  
 for Constitutional Rights, eager to  
 help her litigate, so she is back in  
 court for a new round. 
 In 1994, the US Supreme Court  
 issued its fi rst opinion in a transgender  
 rights case, Farmer v. Brennan, 
  involving a claim by federal  
 inmate  Dee  Farmer  that  the  Bureau  
 of Prisons was failing to protect  
 her  from  sexual  assaults  by  
 other prisoners. The Court ruled  
 that if prison offi cials were deliberately  
 indifferent to such risks, they  
 could be held liable to the inmate  
 for violation of the Eighth Amendment’s  
 ban on “cruel and unusual  
 punishment.” 
 Now Ashley Diamond, having  
 been raped more than a dozen  
 times since she was incarcerated  
 last fall and denied her usual hormone  
 treatment with appropriate  
 monitoring, is claiming that Alabama  
 offi cials are being deliberately  
 indifferent to her safety and  
 medical needs. The Biden Administration, 
   shifting  away  from  
 Out lesbian Pamela S. Karlan is leading the Department of Justice’s Statement of Interest reminding  
 courts of the obligations of prison systems toward trans inmates.  
 the transphobia of its immediate  
 predecessor, was moved to lend a  
 hand. 
 The Statement of Interest, prepared  
 by attorneys from the Civil  
 Rights Division of the Department  
 of Justice (DOJ), led by Pamela S.  
 Karlan, an out lesbian who is the  
 Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney  
 General for Civil Rights, gives  
 the court a detailed description of  
 the  constitutional  and  statutory  
 obligations of prison systems towards  
 transgender inmates. Without  
 taking a position on any of the  
 facts in this case, the Statement  
 of Interest reminds the court that  
 the Prison Rape Elimination Act,  
 passed by Congress to address  
 the epidemic of sexual assault in  
 prisons, requires prison offi cials to  
 protect inmates against sexual assault, 
  going one step beyond what  
 the Supreme Court required in  
 Farmer v. Brennan to mandate affi  
 rmative efforts. 
 The Statement of Interest reminds  
 the court that prison offi  
 cials are required to conduct an  
 individualized  assessment  of  the  
 risks  of  harm  faced  incoming  inmates, 
   including  taking  into  account  
 the inmate’s concerns as  
 well as the history of the particular  
 institution and the past experience  
 of the inmate. And, noting Ashley  
 REUTERS/LOREN ELLIOTT 
 Diamond’s request to be housed in  
 a women’s prison, the Statement  
 of Interest mentions that failure to  
 provide such alternative housing if  
 it is necessary to protect a transgender  
 inmate from sexual attacks  
 could constitute deliberate indifference  
 in violation of the Eighth  
 Amendment and the Prison Rape  
 Elimination Act. 
 Furthermore, when  it  comes  to  
 medical treatment, the Statement  
 of Interest recites in detail the  
 history of litigation establishing  
 the right of transgender inmates  
 to access to medically necessary  
 care — once again determined on  
 an  individualized basis. Diamond  
 contends that she is being denied  
 treatment because of a prison  
 policy of categorically denying particular  
 treatment regardless of the  
 individual needs of the inmate. If  
 so, the Statement of Interest points  
 out that this clearly violates Eighth  
 Amendment precedents. A categorical  
 refusal to provide a treatment  
 that qualifi ed health care providers  
 agree is necessary for a particular  
 individual is the very defi nition of  
 deliberate indifference. 
 “Courts have recognized a wide  
 range of interventions that have  
 been deemed by the Standards of  
 Care and qualifi ed professionals as  
 medically necessary to treat gender  
 LEGAL 
 dysphoria depending on the individual  
 needs of the prisoner,” wrote  
 the DOJ.  “These  treatments have  
 included gender expression allowances  
 such as permanent hair removal, 
  undergarments consistent  
 with a prisoner’s gender identity,  
 pronouns corresponding to a prisoner’s  
 gender identity; and surgery,  
 based on the circumstances of the  
 individual prisoner.” 
 The Statement of Interest also  
 noted court opinions stating that it  
 is not enough to provide hormones;  
 prison health offi cials  must  also  
 monitor and adjust the dosage  
 as needed to meet the individual  
 needs of the inmate. 
 If the prison denies appropriate  
 treatment without having a qualifi  
 ed health care practitioner make  
 an individualized assessment, it  
 is being deliberately indifferent to  
 serious medical needs, because  
 there is now a large accumulation  
 of judicial decisions recognizing  
 that gender dysphoria is a serious  
 medical condition requiring  
 adequate treatment. Although the  
 courts of appeals have not spoken  
 with one voice on these issue, the  
 Supreme Court’s refusal last year  
 to grant the state of Idaho’s petition  
 to review an order from the Ninth  
 Circuit Court of Appeals requiring  
 prison offi cials to provide gender  
 affi rmation surgery to a transgender  
 inmate should have sent a loud  
 message through the federal court  
 system. 
 The Statement of Interest is  
 likely to carry considerable weight  
 with  the  court.  In  most  prisoner  
 litigation, transgender inmates are  
 representing themselves without  
 external allies. The addition of outside  
 public  interest  counsel  helps  
 to redress the power imbalance,  
 and a Statement of Interest from  
 the DOJ, which mentions that an  
 investigation of Alabama prison  
 conditions of transgender inmates  
 is under way, may incentivize the  
 prison authorities to offer a settlement  
 that will provide Ashley Diamond  
 with appropriate protection  
 and health care and send a message  
 to prison administrators nationwide. 
 GayCityNews.com  |  MAY 6 - MAY 19, 2021 27 
 
				
/GayCityNews.com