Op-Ed Letters to the Editor 
 Finding secure retirement  
 for all working New Yorkers 
 BY DEBRA ROBLES  
 For New Yorkers who have spent our lives  
 working hard, retirement should be the time  
 we fi nally get to relax and enjoy our families  
 and free time. But for too many of us, retirement  
 is out of reach. 
 I’m 62 years old. I’ve been working since  
 I was 16. For many of those years I had access  
 to a pension and other retirement savings  
 accounts, and I was able to put money away.  
 But  when  my  mom  was  diagnosed  with  Alzheimer’s  
 disease, I had to stop working so I  
 could care for her. Like the many other Boomers  
 who fi nd themselves in similar situations,  
 instead of saving for retirement, I had to take  
 money out of my savings to stay afl oat. 
 Now  I’m  back  in  the  workforce,  but  this  
 time  around  I  couldn’t fi nd a job that offers  
 a retirement savings plan. I’m not alone. Millions  
 of New Yorkers are in the same boat. In  
 New York State, over half of all private sector  
 employees 18- to 64-years-old lack access to a  
 workplace retirement savings plan. The number  
 is over 60% for Millennials (18 to 34 years  
 old),  higher  than any other age group. Many  
 of us wonder: will  retirement  ever be within  
 reach? 
 That’s why I support the Retirement Security  
 for All legislation that Councilmembers  
 Ben Kallos and I. Daneek Miller introduced in  
 the City Council last month.  
 Under their proposed law, employers with  
 more than fi ve employees would enable workers  
 to deduct a percentage of their pay to retirement  
 savings accounts. Employees would  
 be able to opt-out at any time. An estimated  
 2.8  million working  New  Yorkers would  get  
 access to a retirement plan and employers  
 wouldn’t  even  have  to  pay  for  it  –  the  city  
 would cover the costs of setting up the plans.  
 This is exactly what we need.  
 According to AARP’s “High Anxiety” report, 
   over  one-third  of  Gen-Xers  and  over  
 40% of Boomers have no retirement savings  
 at all. We know that people are 15 times more  
 likely  to  save  for  retirement  if  they  have  access  
 to an employer-sponsored plan. Council  
 Members Kallos  and Miller’s plan  is  just  the  
 solution we need. 
 People clearly want to save for retirement,  
 and they know that they should. But in my experience, 
  most working New Yorkers are busy  
 taking  care  of  themselves  and  their  families,  
 and it’s hard to even know where to get started  
 to set up a retirement plan. 
 If  passed,  Retirement  Security  for  All  
 wouldn’t cost businesses or taxpayers. I know  
 that many  small  businesses  in New York  are  
 also struggling. So one of the things I like  
 about this legislation is that no public money  
 will go into the accounts, and it doesn’t require  
 employers to contribute. All they’d have  
 to  do  is  handle  the  paperwork.  I  think most  
 employers want their employees to be fi nancially  
 secure  and  would  be  happy  to  do  this  
 small thing to help make it happen. 
 As a lifelong New Yorker, I want to see my  
 city do right by its residents. Passing Retirement  
 Security for All is a smart and simple way  
 to help us enjoy the retirement we deserve. 
 Debra Robles lives in East Harlem. 
 SAVING THE  
 WATERFRONT 
 Seven years ago, the East  
 River swamped the FDR Drive  
 and reached the edge of my  
 building  on  the  Lower  East  
 Side. The fi ve days after Sandy  
 were  traumatic:  power  and  
 communications down, dark  
 streets and radio reports of the  
 elderly stranded in the taller  
 buildings  of  Co-op  Village  
 where I live.  
 I am haunted by images of  
 hundreds swarming white vans  
 to charge phones, of people  
 carrying buckets of water along  
 Grand Street and fl oating cars  
 careening under  the Williamsburg  
 Bridge.  
 These memories coordinate  
 with the City’s concerns on protecting  
 thousands with planned  
 infrastructure  in  the  100-year  
 fl ood plain overlapping a swath  
 of the Lower East Side.  
 The City of New York has  
 worked on a plan whose fi rst  
 component is before the City  
 Council.  It’s  a  good  start,  adequately  
 funded by the city and  
 the federal government.  
 It’s called the East Side Coastal  
 Resiliency Project (ESCR)  
 and we should approve it.  
 Approve it, because it makes  
 a park for the next century - a  
 landscape that protects people  
 and plants.  
 Approve it, since it will create  
 a universally accessible,  
 continuous landscape - removing  
 awkward ramps, steep  
 stairs and bike resistant paths.  
 Approve it, because it’s not a  
 hard seawall but soft, integrating  
 its fl ood  protection  into  a  
 landscape - not on top of one.  
 Criticism has focused on its  
 construction and the city needs  
 to  continue  answering  questions  
 regarding interim recreation  
 fi elds and storm protection  
 as well as retaining historic  
 components like the Seal Park,  
 while promoting its quality design. 
   
 Caught  between  painful  
 memories of post-Sandy conditions  
 and a healthy skepticism  
 of  local  government  my  view  
 of the plan is not without concerns. 
   
 However, I maintain that city  
 partners and their designers,  
 engineers  and  environmental  
 experts will deliver the protection  
 we deserve.  
 We need  to  remember what  
 we endured and how we rely on  
 a city to survive the kind of destruction  
 it left when we evaluate  
 projects of this kind.  
 A universally accessible park  
 with trees that can survive a  
 salty,  swollen  East  River,  embedded  
 in a natural berm providing  
 fl ood protection, is a  
 good  plan  and  demonstrates  
 our urban design ingenuity.  
 We should support the East  
 Side Coastal Resiliency Project  
 and ask the City Council to approve  
 its ULURP application.  
 William J. Rockwell  
 CHECKING THE  
 FACTS 
 Regarding the bill to ban  
 overnight parking for garbage  
 trucks  on  city  streets:  DSNY  
 should fact check before commenting. 
   The  trucks  parked  
 on 10th Street do not provide  
 services  to  this  area–they  are  
 assigned to garbage services  
 above 14th Street. This lack  
 of knowledge does not give us  
 much confi dence. 
 Susan Stetzer 
 BLAMING  
 RIVERA 
 On the special permits for  
 hotels near Union Square: City  
 Councilwoman  Carlina  Rivera  
 has reneged on every commitment  
 she made in her campaign  
 regarding preservation and opposing  
 over-development and  
 out of context building in the  
 area south of 14th Street. 
 She has clearly been a stooge  
 for big real estate money and  
 the corrupt de Blasio administration  
 from day one of her tenure  
 on the City Council. 
 What a major disappointment  
 she is. 
 Josh Shapiro 
 We always welcome your comments  
 and concerns! Leave a  
 comment on a story at thevillager. 
 com,  send  an  email  to  
 news@thevillager.com (subject  
 line: Letter to the Editor), or  
 write to Letters to the Editor,  
 The Villager, 1 MetroTech Center  
 North, Brooklyn, NY 11207.  
 All letters and comments are  
 subject to editing. Names may  
 be withheld upon  request, but  
 anonymous letters will not be  
 considered for publication. 
 Quite the view... 
 PHOTO BY TODD MAISEL 
 A bird’s eye view of the 49th New York City Marathon run on Nov. 3. 
 Schneps Media November 7, 2019     13 
 
				
link
		link