
10
BROOKLYN WEEKLY, JANUARY 12, 2020
WOODLAND
plaints, the brunch deal was scaled back
to two hours, but the drunkenness continued.
When state liquor honchos fi rst started
debating the future of the popular spot’s
license to sell hooch over the summer, the
bar’s owner claimed his business was being
targeted because it attracted a predominantly
black clientele to a mostly
white neighborhood, and a lobbyist hired
to represent the bar at a State Liquor Authority
hearing accused neighbors of racism.
Local leaders shot back, saying the
bar’s owner Akiva Ofshtein, who is white,
was making life miserable for neighbors
and looking to shift the blame away from
his failure to manage his clientele.
“The complaints here have everything
to do with the persistent refusal of the
owner to be a good neighbor,” Councilman
Brad Lander (D—Park Slope), said
over the summer. “Other establishments
nearby operate bottomless brunches responsibly
and do not receive similar complaints.”
Supporters of the bar say neighbors’
complaints are overblown, and that most of
the supposed incidents they’ve complained
about are unreported and unproved.
“Unfortunately once you make enough
noise about an issue it can take the place of
truth,” said Morgan Flores a community
organizer with The Black Institute who
The SLA shutdown Woodland following a series of
complaints. Photo by Caleb Caldwell
had supported the bar during their licensing
hearing.
Flores said the closing has devastated
those who used to gather at Woodland for
brunch.
“Everyone has their spot and Woodland
was the spot for a lot of people,” she said.
Flores added that a judged ruled against
the restaurant without giving Ofshtein a
chance to make his case formally before
the state.
This isn’t the fi rst time Woodland’s liquor
license has come under threat. In
June the license was revoked after the
state liquor authority held an emergency
hearing, but was quickly reinstated when
a judge lifted the emergency order of suspension,
leading to the fi ght that resulted
in the license being revoked once and for
all in January.
Ofshtein could not be immediately
reached for comment.
Continued from page 1
B44 to ticket bus blockers
BY BEN VERDE
Stay in your lane!
Motorists caught blocking the B44
select bus service lane became subject
to violations on Dec. 30, after a 60 day
grace period following the installation
of bus-mounted cameras came to an
end.
“Our message is loud and clear, bus
lanes are for buses,” said Craig Cipriano,
the Metropolitan Transportation
Authority’s bus czar.
Motorists caught on bus mounted
cameras blocking Brooklyn’s fi rst dedicated
bus lane will receive a $50 fi ne for
their fi rst violation, with the penalty
increasing by $50 up to $250 for recidivist
scoffl aws who are caught multiple
times during a 12-month period.
Since bus mounted cameras were
fi rst activated at the start of the 60 day
grace period, B44 cameras captured
over 7,000 violations in the lane that
runs up Nostrand Avenue from Sheepshead
Bay through East Flatbush and
Crown Heights to Williamsburg. Bus
speeds have increased up to 17 percent
in sections of the route since automated
enforcement began, and that was before
drivers were even issued fi nes.
Cameras will work to capture vehicles
that drive in bus lanes without taking
the next available right turn, and
those that remain parked in lanes for
Authorities will ticket cars that block the B44
bus lane. Photo by Stefano Giovannini
extended periods of time — cars captured
by two separate bus cameras in
the same position will be ticketed.
The B44 is Brooklyn’s second-busiest
bus route after the B46, and the
fi rst in the borough to get the dedicated
bus lane treatment. When the lane was
fi rst implemented back in 2013, commute
times were cut by up to 20 percent
in some areas, despite initial concerns
from local electeds over congestion.
Speeding up buses is a key component
of New York City Transit bigwig
Andy Byford’s Fast Forward plan which
aims to modernize the city’s aging transit
infrastructure.