Citywide robbery pattern materializes: NYPD
The New York City Police
Department is seeking a group
of men who have been connected
to a total of 28 robberies
citywide, including three
in the Bronx that happened in
late May.
In separate robberies that
happened between May 24-25,
a group of unidentifi ed males
armed with handguns and
knives stole victims’ personal
items in the West Fordham,
Westchester Square and Pelham
Garden sections of the
Bronx.
On May 24, at 1:50 a.m., two
males, one armed with a handgun,
stole a 23-year-old male’s
necklace and bracelet, which
are valued at $4,000 and $8,500,
respectively, on the corner of
West Fordham Road and Landing
Road. The unidentifi ed
males fl ed in a dark-color vehicle
that was operated by another
unidentifi ed individual
towards the Major Deegan Expressway.
A second May 24 robbery
took place on 1373 Herschell
Street at 8 p.m., when six unidentifi
ed males, one with a
knife, surrounded a 37-year-old
male who had exited his parked
gray 2018 Toyota Camry. The
The NYPD is investigating a group of men who have been connected to a total of 28 robberies citywide, including three in the Bronx.
Photo courtesy NYPD
suspects stole the keys to the
car, which they used as the getaway
vehicle, in addition to the
man’s iPhone and wallet.
A third incident took place
on May 25 just before 5 a.m.,
when four unidentifi ed males,
one with a handgun, approached
BRONX TIMES REPORTER, J 32 ULY 30-AUG. 5, 2021 BTR
a 34-year-old man in
front of 2709 Young Ave.. The
suspects took the man’s wallet,
which contained ID and bank
cards, and an LG cellphone
before leaving in a black fourdoor
sedan and a light-color
SUV.
The victims were not injured
in either incident, and
police confi rmed that no shots
were not fi red in any of the
three robberies.
Other similar group robberies
have taken place in Manhattan,
Brooklyn and Queens.
The NYPD has classifi ed the incidents
as a “citywide robbery
pattern.”
-Robbie Sequeira
FAMILY COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF THE BRONX
Docket # NN-38241-43-19
SUMMONS
In the Matter of
DERECK/VICTOR/MIA FERNANDEZ
A Child(ren) Under Eighteen Years Alleged to be Neglected by
MARLENY LIRANZO/GERARDO CONSTANZA
Respondent(s)
BRONX FAMILY COURT
LINK IN- https://notify.nycourts.gov/meet/ag3waa
Or 1-929-346-7209
PART 17- CONFERENCE ID – 226988904#
PLEASE CALL NUMBER ABOVE ON DATE AND TIME BELOW
NOTICE: PLACEMENT OF YOUR CHILD IN FOSTER CARE MAY RESULT IN YOUR LOSS OF YOUR
RIGHTS TO YOUR CHILD. IF YOUR CHILD STAYS IN FOSTER CARE FOR 15 OF THE MOST
RECENT 22 MONTHS, THE AGENCY MAY BE REQUIRED BY LAW TO FILE A PETITION TO
TERMINATE YOUR PARENTAL RIGHTS AND TO COMMIT GUARDIANSHIP AND CUSTODY OF
YOUR CHILD TO THE AGENCY FOR THE PURPOSES OF ADOPTION. IN SOME CASES, THE
AGENCY MAY FILE BEFORE THE END OF THE 15-MONTH PERIOD. IF SEVERE OR REPEATED
CHILD ABUSE IS PROVEN BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE, THIS FINDING MAY
CONSTITUTE THE BASIS TO TERMINATE YOUR PARENTAL RIGHTS AND TO COMMIT
GUARDIANSHIP AND CUSTODY OF YOUR CHILD TO THE AGENCY FOR THE PURPOSES OF
ADOPTION.
TO: MARLENY LIRANZO/GERARDO CONSTANZA
A petition under ARTICLE 10 of the FAMILY COURT ACT having been filed with this court alleging that
the above-named child(ren) is a neglected child(ren), a copy of said petition being annexed hereto:
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to appear before this court at 900 Sheridan Avenue, Bronx, New
York 10451, Part 17, on AUGUST 17, 2021 at 9:30 AM in the forenoon of said day to answer the petition
and to show cause why said child(ren) should not be adjudicated to be a neglected child(ren) and why
you should not be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of ARTICLE 10 of the FAMILY COURT
ACT and why an order of support under SECTION 235 of the FAMILY COURT ACT should not be made
if the final disposition is an order of placement.
On your failure to appear as herein directed, a warrant may be issued for your arrest.
FURTHER NOTICE: Family Court Act §154(c) provides that petitions brought pursuant to Articles 4,5,6,8
and 10 of the Family Court Act, in which an order of protection is sought or in which a violation of an order
of protection is alleged, may be served outside the State of New York upon a Respondent who is not a
resident or domiciliary of the State of New York. If no other grounds for obtaining personal jurisdiction
over the Respondent exist aside from the application of this provision, the exercise of personal jurisdiction
over the respondent is limited to the issue of the request for, or alleged violation of, the order of protection.
Where the Respondent has been served with this summons and petition and does not appear, the Family
Court may proceed to a hearing with respect to issuance or enforcement of the order of protection.
STEPHEN BYRNES
CLERK OF COURTS
Dated: 6/28/2021
/ag3waa
/ag3waa