
 
		Pol fi les suit to block conversion 
 BY JESSICA PARKS 
 A southern Brooklyn lawmaker  
 and a coalition of residents  
 are bringing the city’s  
 Department of Transportation  
 to court in hopes of halting  
 the conversion of a stretch of  
 Seventh and Eighth Avenues  
 into one-way streets — claiming  
 that  the  city  hasn’t  done  
 enough outreach. 
 “The New York City Department  
 of  Transportation  
 are just bypassing the whole  
 system,” said Assemblymember  
 Peter Abbate, who represents  
 a swath of southern  
 Brooklyn which includes Sunset  
 Park, Dyker Heights and  
 parts  of  Bensonhurst.  “They  
 are just doing what they want  
 to do and that’s not what city  
 agencies are for.”  
 Under the DOT’s proposal,  
 a portion of both two-way  
 thoroughfares would be converted  
 to  one-ways, with  Seventh  
 Avenue running south  
 between 39th and 65th streets,  
 and Eighth Avenue running  
 north over the same stretch.  
 The project, which also includes  
 new protected bike  
 lanes, extended sidewalks and  
 other safety confi gurations,  
 spans community boards 7, 10  
 and 12.  
 COURIER L 6     IFE, JULY 23-29, 2021 
 The plan lies largely in  
 Sunset Park, where the conversion  
 will run through the  
 heart of Brooklyn’s Chinatown  
 — prompting backlash  
 from members of the Asian  
 community who have rallied  
 against the proposal, claiming  
 the  conversion  will  destroy  
 their commerce. Though, the  
 new one-way streets would  
 also run through a couple of  
 blocks of Bay Ridge and Dyker  
 Heights.  
 ‘A paid posse of  
 youngsters’ 
 The nine plaintiffs — who,  
 along with Abbate, include locals  
 Kenny Guan, Bao Zhi Liu,  
 Vincent Lu, Qinwen Lu, Paul  
 Mak, Grace Mo, Kam Fon Mui  
 and Tsang Sun Mai — fi led an  
 Article 78 proceeding, an appeal  
 of a New York agency’s  
 decision to the state courts,  
 on  July  7  alleging  that  the  
 DOT knowingly violated the  
 New  York  City  Administrative  
 Code when bypassing the  
 mandated  public  outreach  to  
 the affected boards. 
 That  code  requires  the  
 agency  to  notify  the  community  
 board  by  email  when  
 there is any major traffi c proposal  
 comprising  more  than  
 four blocks, after which the  
 agency must bring the plan  
 before the board upon the panel’s  
 request, within 30 days of  
 that request. 
 Instead,  city  transit  bigwigs  
 presented the project to  
 a Community Advisory Board  
 of which, the fi ling  argues,  
 members were handpicked to  
 streamline the project, instead  
 of including the impacted people  
 and businesses.  
 “At the very least the people  
 and businesses of the affected  
 districts have a right to  
 expect their voices to be heard  
 through the legal processes  
 set by the law,” the complaint  
 states, “and not by a paid  
 posse of youngsters, potentially  
 skewing personal interviews  
 to impress their superiors  
 by obtaining the results  
 desired by DOT to accomplish  
 its ends.” 
 The  fi ling  further  alleges  
 that Bay Ridge Community  
 Board 10 District Manager Josephine  
 Beckmann  requested  
 in a May 3 call to DOT rep Leroy  
 Branch  that  the  agency  
 provide a joint meeting for the  
 three community boards, as  
 well as a separate meeting for  
 each  board,  as  she  similarly  
 told Brooklyn Paper in June. 
 The  fi ling states that  
 Branch  told Beckmann  in  response, 
  “because DOT wanted  
 this plan implemented by August, 
  2021, DOT was going to  
 create its own public review  
 process,  thus  bypassing  the  
 Assemblymember Peter Abbate is taking the city’s Department of Transportation  
 to court over an alleged lack of outreach regarding a planned  
 one-way street conversion on Seventh and Eighth Avenues.  File photo 
 Continued on page 22