
 
        
         
		We need an ‘Alliance for America’ 
 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 
 COURIER LIFE, DECEMBER 4-10, 2020 31  
 OP-ED 
 BY MAURICE KOLODIN 
 We may still be the United  
 States of America but clearly,  
 and sadly, we are no longer  
 the united Americans of  
 America. 
 Throughout  our  history,  
 Americans had different political  
 opinions. And that is  
 fi ne. The cornerstone of our  
 Democracy is having differences. 
  Differences in religion.  
 Differences in race. And, yes,  
 as previously stated, differences  
 in opinions about what  
 is best for our country.  
 Overall, and for most  
 years of our country’s existence, 
   we  all  peacefully  coexisted  
 while maintaining  
 our differences and different  
 opinions. The different political  
 opinions were discussed  
 and debated; heated at times,  
 but always in a civilized manner. 
  Civilized. Meaning in a  
 civil manner.  
 Political differences were  
 settled by elections. Heated.  
 Hard-fought. But when an  
 election ended, Americans  
 remembered one thing, fi rst  
 and foremost. We were all  
 Americans.  This  was  our  
 country. We  were  opponents  
 — not enemies. Elections  
 were “fought” to win — not  
 for annihilation. 
 Between elections, Americans  
 understood that in order  
 to govern, for our collective  
 survival, people with different  
 opinions had to compromise  
 so  as  to  accomplish  things  
 for our collective well-being.  
 What was obvious was that,  
 in order to move forward, we  
 had to do this together for our  
 country. 
 Working together, by people  
 with possibly differing  
 views,  is  considered  an  alliance; 
  people working together  
 for shared goals while still  
 maintaining different views  
 on other matters. It is done in  
 a civil manner and without  
 anger or hatred  toward each  
 other. 
 That is what we need  
 now — an “ALLIANCE FOR  
 AMERICA!” 
 We must remember that  
 this is our country – ONE  
 country with ONE people!  
 We must concentrate on our  
 shared goals, not our few  
 disagreements. We must  not  
 let politics and partisanship  
 come between our common  
 needs, desires, and goals. 
 Political parties are merely  
 vehicles for a broad perspective  
 of its membership. Virtually  
 no one agrees with everything  
 any political party has  
 as its positions in its Party  
 Platform. In fact, the truth is,  
 virtually no one knows most  
 of the positions that their  
 Party has in its Platform! And  
 therein is likely the problem!  
 So many of us are “partisan  
 soldiers”  in  an  army  whose  
 members do not really know  
 what they are fi ghting for! 
 Wake up, people! I am not  
 suggesting  that  we  abandon  
 political parties. Let’s just put  
 them in their proper perspective. 
  They do not, and should  
 not, govern our daily lives.  
 What  should  govern  is  each  
 of us feeling that we are part  
 of an “Alliance for America.”  
 Pursuing shared and common  
 goals for our joint betterment. 
  Let’s look at it another  
 way: at the typical Thanksgiving  
 family get together, do  
 we go to enjoy being with the  
 whole family or, primarily, for  
 the purpose of arguing with  
 the stereotypical “crazy uncle” 
  that every family has?! 
 The “Alliance for America” 
  should be viewed as our  
 joint family get-together. Let’s  
 not confuse where our true  
 interests lie for our collective  
 well-being. The efforts we  
 need to make to work together  
 is more  than  a  full  time  job  
 and that leaves no time to concentrate  
 on being roadblocks  
 for each other. 
 We must remember that  
 the primary purpose of a political  
 party is to elect its candidates  
 to public offi ce. As an  
 addendum, to fi nd jobs for the  
 party faithful. And you know  
 what? That’s all good for us! It  
 is when we, the voters, forget  
 that membership in a political  
 party is not comparable to belonging  
 to a cult. That elected  
 offi cials are public servants  
 who are to be respected and  
 supported if they are doing  
 a good job. But the political  
 party and the elected offi cial  
 should NOT be worshipped.  
 Tolerance for our differing  
 opinions must be shown, understood, 
  and accepted. Disagreement  
 should lead to discussion, 
  not destruction. 
 Several weeks from now,  
 our country will have a new  
 administration in the White  
 House. I believe that the ideas  
 expressed herein, and the concept  
 of an “Alliance for America,” 
  is in sync with the ideas  
 and direction that the Biden- 
 Harris team would like to see  
 the American people follow. 
 Toward  that  end,  I would  
 hope that, to promote the  
 same, Biden-Harris would  
 consider creating AMBASSADORS  
 2 AMERICA 4 AMERICA. 
  This non-partisan, nonsalaried, 
  appointed group  
 should be comprised of celebrities  
 from different walks of  
 life; from sports, entertainment, 
  academia, politics, government  
 service, military  
 service, religious leaders,  
 union leaders, business leaders, 
  etc. These Ambassadors  
 would carry the “Alliance  
 for America” message to our  
 entire country and all of our  
 people.  
 Perhaps our country can  
 begin to return, at least in part,  
 to what we once were. Perhaps  
 even to what we always should  
 have been. Perhaps. 
 Hon. Maurice H. Kolodin  
 is  President  of  Shorefront  
 Partnership Alliance. 
 Weighing in 
 Dear Editor, 
 I would like to respond to  
 the article, “Weigh in on Proposed  
 MTA Fare Hikes at Upcoming  
 Hearings”  (November  
 30, 2020). 
 Riders Alliance Executive  
 Director Betsy Plum urges  
 the city to advance an equitable  
 recovery for all. Her plan  
 involves  not  only  stagnating  
 the fare but also sacrifi cing  
 the health and safety of everyone  
 in New York City. The  
 fact is, the MTA terminated  
 24/7 service in order to clean  
 and sanitize its train cars as a  
 means of protecting its workers  
 and its riders. Right now,  
 their fi nances are supposedly  
 “ravaged” by the pandemic.  
 With  that  said,  her  suggestion  
 that the MTA should double  
 down on service but not  
 increase  the  fare  is  outright  
 unreasonable. Would a fare  
 hike of $0.05 to $0.10 really be  
 so bad in order to protect and  
 maintain  the  train  network  
 we all depend on? 
 The article begins by describing  
 the potential fare  
 hikes as a “regressive tax  
 on essential workers.” This  
 fare hike is a proposed 2 - 4%  
 percent  increase  from  the  
 current $2.75 single-fare. Although  
 some  critics,  such  as  
 the Riders Alliance, believe  
 the MTA should be focused on  
 providing and restoring 24/7  
 service, the reality is that  
 the MTA is already stretched  
 thin on resources and its own  
 supply  of  workers,  most  of  
 whom are considered “essential” 
  themselves.  
 If the MTA does not receive  
 its proposed fare hikes,  
 we may expect to see a decline  
 in  quality  or  possibly  even  
 a downsizing of our current  
 transit system. Let the MTA  
 continue  to  do  what  it  has  
 been doing to safeguard New  
 Yorkers during this unprecedented  
 and chaotic time. 
 Sincerely, 
 Byron Lo 
 Native Brooklyn Resident 
 We must put an end to  
 gerrymandering 
 Dear Editor, 
 If  this  past  election  has  
 taught  us  anything,  it’s  that  
 each of our votes truly matters  
 and must be counted. To  
 make sure that a fair election  
 process happens every time,  
 we must have fair electoral  
 maps and end the practice of  
 gerrymandering. We all need  
 to play an active  role  in how  
 our political maps are drawn  
 during  the  upcoming  redistricting  
 process. 
 Redistricting is the process  
 of redrawing our districts  
 to refl ect the change in  
 our population recorded by  
 the Census, which occurs every  
 10 years. Gerrymandering  
 happens when politicians manipulate  
 this process in order  
 to draw electoral maps that  
 ensure their party wins more  
 districts that are out of proportion  
 to the actual percentage  
 of the population. Gerrymandering  
 changes the value  
 and weight of every vote. It’s  
 unfair and it’s wrong--no matter  
 which party tries it. 
 Our political system is broken  
 and politicians are making  
 it worse by using gerrymandering  
 to ensure they get  
 re-elected.  Gerrymandering  
 contributes  to  hyper-partisanship  
 in our politics and allows  
 politicians to pander to  
 special interests, but ignore  
 the people they represent. 
 2021  is an important  year  
 because we the people can  
 call and lobby our elected offi  
 cials as they draw maps. We  
 can demand and attend hearings. 
  We can make it known  
 that  it’s  time  to  end  gerrymandering. 
  I’m asking my  
 neighbors to join me and push  
 for fair maps. 
 New  York  will  be  drawing  
 maps  in  an  entirely  new  
 way next year, after a process  
 change was approved by voters  
 in 2014. We must ensure  
 that the results are fair maps  
 for all. 
 Sincerely, 
 Rachel Karp 
 11231